THE SERENA WILLIAMS - MARIA Sharapova 'rivalry' is the weakest narrative in sports - Phillips

It was supposed to be their 22nd meeting.

And if we’re being honest, Monday’s Round of 16 matchup at the French Open would have been the 20th time that Serena Williams defeated Maria Sharapova, giving her 19 consecutive wins over the Russian.

But a pectoral muscle injury forced Williams out of the match that had become the most anticipated contest in women’s tennis.

“Unfortunately I’m having some issues with my pec muscle. Right now I can’t actually serve so it’s kind of hard to play,” Williams said Monday morning during a press conference at Roland-Garros.

“I love playing Maria. It’s a match I always get up for. Her game matches up so well against mine.”

“I’m beyond disappointed. I gave up so much from time with my daughter and time with my family all for this moment. So it’s really difficult to be in this situation.”

As much as the sports world wanted to see Williams and Sharapova face each other, it’s hard not to feel as if we knew what the outcome was going to be even before the match ever began.

Because when you dominate a single opponent the way Williams has over the years, it isn’t a rivalry.

It’s reoccurring annihilation.

Rivalries are Michigan vs. Ohio State, Duke vs. North Carolina, Yankees vs. Red Sox, Alabama vs. Auburn, Army vs. Navy, Celtics vs. Lakers, Cowboys vs. that football team in D.C.

But the thing that makes rivalries so great, is that no matter how good or bad one side may be at the time of the contest, you know there’s a chance that the unthinkable can happen. All great rivalries have upsets, or at the very least, the feeling that the weaker opponent always has a shot,That feeling doesn’t exist with Williams and Sharapova. Because when you lose 18 straight to someone, all hopes of an upset tend to evaporate.

However, there is something intriguing about this matchup that’s viewed as the crown jewel of women’s tennis, and race and society’s flawed views of what grace and beauty truly are lay at the center of it.

In the case of Williams, she’s bold, confident, curvaceous, and a fearless black woman who is also one of the greatest tennis players to ever pick up a racket.

She’s also a celebrity, a new mom and a fashion icon.

“I love the catsuit,” said German tennis player Andrea Petkovic about Williams’ new black bodysuit that she calls “Catsuit 2.0.” “I might copy her catsuit and walk with it, but probably only in New York, because that’s, I guess, the only city where you can actually pull it off.”

From the pink dress she recently wore to the Royal Wedding to her ever-evolving on-court fashion choices, Williams has always done more to fit the narrative of being a model.

But since she isn’t rail thin with long blonde hair, that label gets assigned to Sharapova.

Don’t believe me?

Check out the transcript from an exchange between Williams and a member of the media at a recent press conference.

Question: “I know you want to get back to Olympia, work with me here, please.”

Williams: “Work with me (smiling).”

Question: “We’re in this together, baby.”

Williams: “No, we’re not; you’re not going home to a screaming baby.”

Question: “I have been waiting about 14 years to ask you this question. After the 2004 Wimbledon match with Maria, I had the opportunity to interview Donald Trump on his L.A. golf course, and he said that Maria’s shoulders were incredibly alluring and then he came up with this incredible analysis: that you were intimidated by her supermodel good looks. My question is: Have you ever been intimidated by anyone on a tennis court, and what are your thoughts about that occurrence?”

Williams: “I honestly don’t have any thoughts about that. I can’t say I have been intimidated by anyone. That’s all. That’s it.”

This is the part where I remind you that at the age of 35, Williams became the only tennis player — man or woman — to win 23 Grand Slam singles titles in the Open Era.

Yet people want to ask her if she’s intimidated by a person she’s 19-2 against because she has “nice shoulders.”

That’s funny, and racist, as hell.

“What I find interesting is not the athletic element of it, because this isn’t close at all, really. It’s that, Maria Sharapova is supposed to be the beauty. The supermodel-esque beauty, and Serena Williams is supposed to be the brawn,” said ESPN’s Pablo Torre on Monday’s premiere episode of “High Noon.”

“We have seen complications on that rivalry for years now, and yet somehow that is the narrative that sticks.”

Torre brings up a good point, because across the landscape of sports media, the “rivalry” narrative has endured over time although the results prove that one has never existed.

But this thing is less about sports and more about culture. Sharapova serves as the last “Great White Hype” in a sport that was created by, and played by, white athletes for decades. But since the arrival of the Williams Sisters, and particularly Serena, the women’s game has been dominated by women of color.

Women’s tennis began as a very dainty sport in which women played in long dresses, as it was viewed as more of a social event than an athletic contest.

Fast forward to today, and the face of the sport is a dark-skinned muscular black woman who grunts every time she hits the ball.

And some people aren’t happy about that, which is why they can’t get over the fact that Sharapova will never be the game’s white savior.

Williams is so much better than Sharapova at tennis, that Sharapova is coming off a doping suspension in which she used meldonium as a means to enhance her performance because Williams puts that much fear in her heart.

“First of all, her physical presence is much stronger and bigger than you realize watching TV,” wrote Sharapova in her book “Unstoppable: My Life So Far.”

“She has thick arms and thick legs and is so intimidating and strong. It’s the whole thing — her presence, her confidence, her personality.”

“Even now, she can make me feel like a little girl.”

But according to one tennis coach, it’s not so much of Williams’ “physical attributes” that make her great. It’s her work ethic and desire.

“Serena has great tennis talent, but above all she has this fire,” Belgian coach Philippe Dehaes told the New York Times. “And when I watch the other young players coming up now, I just don’t see it. It’s the whole package with Serena: the confidence, the desire to win — or more refusing to lose as if losing were an illness. I honestly didn’t think she’d beat (Ash) Barty, who is 17th in the world.

“But when I see Serena winning, I am angry in a way,” he continued, making quotation marks in the air with his fingers as he said “angry.” “I am happy to see her win of course because I have a lot of respect for her, but I’m angry when I think of the others. I say, ‘Wake up, girls. Serena is nearly 37 years old. What does it take for you to wake up?’”

Dehaes is right, because from Martina Hingis to Sloane Stephens to Sharapova, Serena has never truly had a rival. In fact, the closest anyone has ever come to that is her sister Venus, who has beaten her 12 times.

Whenever a great athlete or team arrives on the scene, we look for somebody to compare them to. A challenger to serve as a barometer for their greatness.

Maria Sharapova has never been and will never be that for Serena Williams, which is why this lazy narrative needs to stop.

Because when you really think about it, Serena has always been battling her true rival in front of us this entire time.

And that rival is herself.

SOURCE : DAILY NEWS  new york.